This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find Out More
The issue Until 5 April 2026 trading companies will generally benefit from a full inheritance tax (IHT) exemption due to the availability of Business Property Relief (BPR). From 6 April 2026 any value over £1m (on a person-by-person basis) will face an IHT liability of 20% (due to BPR only being available at 50%). Under either scenario ‘excess cash’ held in the company would be fully subject to IHT at 40%. There is therefore an IHT incentive to either demonstrate that such cash is not ‘excess’ because it has been earmarked for a business purpose, or alternatively the matter can be put beyond doubt by purchasing a business asset (such as business premises). It is unrealistic to expect such companies to ‘magic up’ an asset purchase just for IHT purposes, but there are many cases where the property that a company operates from is held by a related pension scheme. For this reason, it may make sense for companies to consider using such excess cash to acquire property from the pension scheme. Big IHT changes are also afoot for pension schemes. From 6 April 2027 pension schemes will be fully within the charge to IHT. Example Russ owns a successful toy manufacturing company (Big Ltd) which operates from Toy Towers which is a factory worth £2m owned by his pension scheme (as its only asset). Big Ltd is worth around £12m, of which £3m of this value is represented by excess cash. If nothing is done here, then (ignoring IHT nil rate band): 1. IHT of £3.6m would be payable on Russ’s death after 5 April 2027. This is computed as 40% of £2m (the pension scheme) + 20% of £8m (BPR qualifying shares over £1m) + 40% of £3m (excess cash).2. IHT of £2.8m would be payable on Russ’s death after 5 April 2026 but before 6 April 2027. This is computed as 20% of £8m (BPR qualifying shares over £1m) + 40% of £3m (excess cash).3. IHT of £1.2m would be payable if Russ were to die now. This is computed as 40% of £3m (excess cash). If £2,089,500 of excess cash was used to purchase the property (there would be £89,500 of SDLT) then this would reduce the IHT bill in all the above scenarios by £435,800 because the excess cash (on which IHT would be payable) would be reduced and the £2m property would attract 50% BPR. WSM’s view This kind of planning can make a lot of sense under different scenarios. Furthermore, if the property appreciates significantly, then IHT savings may increase due to the property attracting a level of IHT relief which would not be enjoyed within the pension scheme. This will also help scheme members extract cash from the fund whether as tax-free lump sums or taxable pensions. After 5 April 2027 a broad planning point is to extract pension funds and spend them, rather than leaving them to beneficiaries who will effectively suffer a double layer of IHT and income tax.
Jamie joined the firm in December 2019 having become a member of the ICAEW while training in the Private Markets division at Deloitte. His experience is primarily in the SME sector where he manages a wide range of compliance and advisory projects. In July 2021 he gained his Chartered Tax Advisory Qualification which has enabled him to develop his owner managed business and personal tax knowledge to give his clients a holistic advisory service. Away from WSM, Jamie is a keen watcher and participator in anything to do with sport and regularly runs marathons.
The issue We understand that Angela Rayner has ‘got off’ without a penalty for underpaying around £40,000 of SDLT on a house
The issue It is not uncommon for shareholders to lend personal funds to a company to allow it to meet various business expenses.
The issue There has been lots of press around Property 118 (P118) over the last few years. Currently, if worst comes to