This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find Out More
The issue
We are seeing and hearing about an increasing number of HMRC errors in relation to tax enquiries. I am not just talking about typos and the occasional time when HMRC’s letter writing goes haywire, but rather notices which are addressed to a different taxpayer than they are sent to. This issue seems to be particularly relevant to the raft of enquiries (purported to be) initiated by the Individual and Small Business Compliance Unit in connection with research and development (R&D) tax relief claims.
Example scenario
Our client, Widgets Ltd, received a letter on 20 September 2023 enquiring into an R&D claim made in the company’s tax return for the year ended 31 December 2021. The return was submitted on 31 December 2022. So far so good you may say – the enquiry has been made within a year of the tax return being submitted.
However, although the letter was sent to Widgets Ltd on time, the enclosed notice of enquiry – also dated 20 September 2023 – was addressed to a completely different (unrelated) company called Valves R Us Ltd. Widgets Ltd didn’t think much about the mention of the other company and started diligently answering HMRC’s standard queries on R&D.
We got involved in March 2024 and rapidly closed down the enquiry. HMRC’s notice had been invalid and they had almost certainly breached a duty of confidentiality by sending one company’s enquiry notice to another company. One wonders whether Valves R Us Ltd received the enquiry notice for Widgets Ltd and also how big the extent of this problem really is.
We fear that there will be many ongoing cases where companies are spending time and resources dealing with invalid enquiries.
Our view
The rules are very clear that enquiry notices need to be issued within a set period of time. The above kind of error is probably more likely to occur when HMRC do one of their ‘mass initiatives’ as is the case with R&D. But it is simply not good enough if they cannot gear their systems up to match the enquiry notices with the recipients of the letters. Here they should forfeit the opportunity to enquire.
Everyone should be carefully checking the documentation that purports to open a tax enquiry and if it is erroneous they should ask HMRC to accept that the enquiry is invalid. Clearly it would not be a good idea to raise this sort of objection in time for HMRC to get its act together and raise a proper enquiry!
We would be interested in hearing from readers who have experience of enquiries being erroneously made in this way.
Peter undertook business studies at Kingston University after leaving school and then accepted a place working for the Inland Revenue, working firstly at Walton on Thames and then promoted and relocated to Richmond. He was then offered a job with Wilkinson Latham, a small firm of Chartered Accountants, where he had worked for over 27 years and finally became a partner, before joining the tax team at WSM in 2014. In his spare time, you may occasionally find him at Box Hill with his beloved Classic Dragstar Motorbike.
The issue We understand that Angela Rayner has ‘got off’ without a penalty for underpaying around £40,000 of SDLT on a house
The issue It is not uncommon for shareholders to lend personal funds to a company to allow it to meet various business expenses.
The issue There has been lots of press around Property 118 (P118) over the last few years. Currently, if worst comes to